If we are to assume that all insurance policies are identical in the coverage that they provide, Then from a pricing standpoint a direct model makes sense. However all insurance contracts are not the same. For example in the state of Ohio Geico has a provision (Along with State Farm) called 'other insurance' Clause.Pathwayinsurance wrote:I believe you are incorrect in your assumption. Clients do want value. You just need To take steps to educate them on why they need value. To give an example, how many people Feel irritated when they call to ask a question on The cable bill, phone bill, credit card To be connected to an individual the barely speaks English?d's insurance store wrote:You can scream 'value' all you want. Overwhelming trends indicate that the personal lines insurance product has been positioned as a commodity product by large segments of the insurance buying public. The GEICO/Progressive model emphasizing price is just one reason.Pathwayinsurance wrote:Insurance companies are paying close attention to the GEICO model of writing business direct. Agents need to implement aggressive marketing tactics To overcome the TV ($1 billion) budget this company has at their disposal.
What is The only compelling Proposition that GEICO can talk about?
Price.
Agents on the other hand can talk about a variety Of different services that can be offered versus a cheap price, a local agent clients can meet with versus a toll free number (and the guarantee that you would never speak with the same CSR twice when buying insurance direct) for customer service.
The local angle is just one advantage, there are many other advantage agents bring to the table.
In no way am I forecasting the death of a market segment that will still and always want a personal touch for their insurance needs, it's just a shrinking piece of the pie that does not bode well for the licensed agent who wishes to embark on a new main street agency business venture, starting from scratch.
Personal lines insurance buyers have for years been separating into two groups...those who need higher limits of coverage and those just wishing to 'get by' with minimums. There's no longer a real place in our industry where a thougtful conversation takes place over the merits of 25/50 or 50/100 Aubo BI limits...the consumer has dictated that 250/500 is where they want to be if there are assets that need to be protected or 15/30 if the consumer is living a brick/board/beanbag lifestyle.
Technology advances and consumer demands and just plain marketplace changes are what will turn the smaller, boutique, main street insurance retailer into a dinosaur marching towards the tar pits in the coming decade.
Companies employ customer service representatives in foreign countries because the wages are less.
The same principle applies when folks purchase insurance from Geico. For example if you purchase insurance from Geico And you need assistance on your car insurance policy You make a telephone call to a toll-free number. It's quite likely that you would never speak to the same CSR twice.
Clients really want familiarity, They want a relationship, Not a stranger. What we have to do as agents is to properly educate clients on The role and importance of the local agent.
While it's true that this clause is also found in many standard policies through carriers in the uninsured motorist and UIM section, This clause is found in their standard contractual language under liability. So in other words if you allow your brother to borrow your car and he causes an accident and you submit your claim through Geico (Assumes you are insured with Geico)
Geico will deny the claim Because the brother has insurance elsewhere, What if the brother only has state minimum limits, And you have 250,000 Limits?
Taking time to study contractual language and the policy language of your competitors is a powerful way to educate prospects that they need a professional local agent who understands the policies that they offer And your competitors.
Does that make sense?