Page 1 of 1

Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 12:02 pm
by jinman
Do you mean does not have coverage at all or do you mean does not have coverage with your company??

Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 12:37 pm
by CATHIEA
Be very careful in wording your letter to the city. You can and should only state that the insured was insured with carrier name, policy number, effective date, expiration date. End of letter. Do not say there was a lapse in coverage (client could very well have gotten another policy from somewhere else as far as you know - let the client explain to the city). We have this type of thing happen routinely whether it's a general contractor holding a cert, a municipality or the motor vehicle division. You can oly state facts. I never give information out verbally either - you can be sued for saying something wrong.

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:33 am
by jinman
Then I agree with CATHIEA - can only state what you know.

coverage

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 10:02 am
by LadyBroker
If they didn't renew with you, then you are not certain that they were bare, you only know they didn't renew with you. That's all you can attest to, and I would simply say that, in writing, and be done with it.

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 2:24 pm
by Porter
Was the city listed on the policy?

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:20 pm
by sanddog1
Porter, CATHIEA known exactly what is right and wrong on this one, Follow her words and you're safe. :wink:

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:14 pm
by Porter
Sanddog,

My point is if the City was not named on the policy you can not give them any information about the policy. If they were listed you would simply mail them a copy of the cancellation letter that they should received on cancellation.


8)

certificate

Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:58 am
by LadyBroker
Good point, Porter.