Federal Flood Fund Funding Debate
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 11:58 am
Fellow Insurance Workers,
I keep hearing in the news about the Flood funding and keeping it solvent. I was wondering if anyone else thinks the way I do...
Currently, the Flood fund is paid for by policyholders AND subsidized by everyone else. My question is, if states can pool auto, home, and business, whereby rates cover losses, why can't we do that with Flood???
Why are rates subsidized??? Its stupidity at the highest level in my opinion.
Also, why are people allowed to collect from the Fund who are not policyholders??? Stupidity!
Raise rates and make the Fund operate as a real company would have to. If people can't afford the insurance, they won't build in flood plains, because they can't get mortgages...AS IT SHOULD BE!
I keep hearing in the news about the Flood funding and keeping it solvent. I was wondering if anyone else thinks the way I do...
Currently, the Flood fund is paid for by policyholders AND subsidized by everyone else. My question is, if states can pool auto, home, and business, whereby rates cover losses, why can't we do that with Flood???
Why are rates subsidized??? Its stupidity at the highest level in my opinion.
Also, why are people allowed to collect from the Fund who are not policyholders??? Stupidity!
Raise rates and make the Fund operate as a real company would have to. If people can't afford the insurance, they won't build in flood plains, because they can't get mortgages...AS IT SHOULD BE!