Pagarigan v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare of California Inc.
(California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Oct. 25, 2005)
Ruling: At issue on this appeal was the liability of a health maintenance organization, which contracts out its healthcare responsibilities to various providers, when one or more of those providers denies medically necessary services or commits malpractice in the delivery of those services. The court concluded that the HMO owes a duty to avoid contracting with deficient providers or negotiating contract terms that require or duly encourage denials of service or below standard performance by its providers.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Q4 Global Commercial Insurance Rates Drop 4%, in 6th Quarterly Decline: Marsh
What Analysts Are Saying About the 2026 P/C Insurance Market
Maine Plane Crash Victims Worked for Luxury Travel Startup Led by Texas Lawyer
Beazley Agrees to Zurich’s Sweetened £8 Billion Takeover Bid 


