Garamendi v. Superior National Insurance
(California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Oct. 26, 2005)(Unpublished)
Ruling: At issue was the trial court decision denying the insureds’ proof of claim for paid time-off benefits as a first priority claim under Insurance Code �1033(a)(1). The court held that a proof of paid time-off benefits is properly disallowed, where the claimant remanded the employee of the insurance holding company after being terminated by the Commissioner of Insurance.
Information compiled by Goldberg Segalla. Web site:
www.goldbergsegalla.com.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Lawyer for Prominent Texas Law Firm Among Victims ID’d in Maine Plane Crash
Allstate Doubles Q4 Net Income While Auto Underwriting Income Triples
Beazley Agrees to Zurich’s Sweetened £8 Billion Takeover Bid
Trapped Tesla Driver’s 911 Call: ‘It’s on Fire. Help Please’ 


