Valuing the Deal: It’s What You Keep That Matters

By Alfonso Ventoso | February 22, 2009

We talk with clients all the time about the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) marketplace, advising owners on positioning their businesses for the best exit whether they are three months or three years away from transitioning out. Once fit has been determined and price is settled, clients may think the work is over. It is true that once the timing is right for a client to go to market, we spend much of our energy analyzing and negotiating deal pricing to get the best results. We haggle with buyers over pro forma earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), and we go back to them to make the case for why higher EBITDA multiples are justified. We negotiate structure: guaranteed proceeds versus earn-out, stock sale versus asset sale, and many other facets.

Ultimately, three components must align in order for a deal to close: culture, pricing/structure and terms. As advisors, we will typically justify our fee several times over through our impact on pricing and structure alone. However, more deals unravel over terms than anything else.

We will focus on the terms that generate various kinds of hard costs, holdbacks and soft costs that are the frictional costs of selling a private business and impact every deal. These often come as surprises to our clients who are selling their businesses. Getting our minds around these issues early in the process avoids loss of momentum later. As clients get comfortable with these costs, the resulting net number they should expect is revised to a realistic level.

Let’s use an example of an agency with $10 million in net commission revenues, and pro forma EBITDA of $3 million or 30 percent. After negotiations, the parties agree on pricing of 7.0 times EBITDA guaranteed (most now, some later), plus an earn-out potential of another 1.0 times EBITDA. The many ways earn-outs can be structured have been the subject of many an article, and will not be repeated here. This example implies a potential gross value to the seller of $24 million. While there is some kind of target to be hit over a two- to four-year timeframe to achieve the $3 million earn-out component, it is the maximum number, in this case $24 million, that typically becomes the “anchor” number in the seller’s head. It is important to note this will be the gross amount the buyer is willing to pay for the earnings power of the business represented on the income statement.

Now for a walk through the hard and soft costs that will erode this number significantly.

Hard Cost 1: Balance Sheet and Working Capital

Balance sheet adjustments can include the removal of intangible assets resulting from acquisitions (the buyer can’t count them twice, as the earnings power represented by these assets is already being paid for as a multiple of the income stream). Producer vesting or deferred compensation liabilities can also be significant and often leave balance sheets neutral or even negative. Let’s say our agency has the following simplified balance sheet:

All amounts in $000
Cash $200
Receivables $300
Intangibles $1,000
Total Assets $1,500
Payables $300
Equity $1,200

Since the buyer is paying for the earnings power of intangibles that are already flowing through the income statement, these are removed and the pro forma equity (tangible net worth) is now $200,000.

Our agency’s pro forma expenses of $7 million per year imply average operating expenditures of $580,000 a month. A buyer does not want to pay you $24 million for your business and then have to inject more money into the business during the first month in order to keep the lights on and make payroll. This is why a working capital holdback is customary. A 30-day working capital requirement in this case would result in a $580,000 deduction from proceeds. Some buyers start by asking for 60 days, which would be almost $1.2 million. The seasonality of revenues, the margins, and the likeliness that revenues will recur all drive a buyer’s comfort level as to how low a requirement they will accept. We find that 30 to 45 days is reasonable in most cases.

Using 30 days in this example, recall there is $200,000 of tangible equity in the business and a working capital requirement of $580,000. Though the mechanics are different in a purchase of stock versus a purchase of assets, in either case the buyer will reduce the purchase price received by the seller by a net of $380,000 to have sufficient working capital.

Hard Cost 2: E&O Tail Insurance

Sellers are responsible for securing their own errors and omissions liability for incidents taking place after closing. A typical coverage period would be three years. A premium in the range of $50,000 to $100,000 for this size business is a small price to pay rather than suffer a claim that could jeopardize the entire pot.

Hard Cost 3: Other Closing Costs

Hiring competent advisors for the transaction along with legal and tax representation will provide instant return on investment while also dramatically increasing the likelihood that a deal gets done at all. A working assumption might be 3 percent to 7 percent of the total purchase price, depending on the complexity of the transaction and the way the agreements are structured.

Hard Cost 4: Capital Gains Tax

Most deals are structured so that sellers capture capital gains rates above their cost basis. In an asset deal, a buyer will allocate this amount between intangible assets (which are amortizable and provide a tax shield) and goodwill, which is not. Capital gains taxes are currently at an all time low of 15 percent at the federal level. The best case is that the rate stays at its current level, with the fallback that it reverts back to 20 percent in 2011. With the new administration, it is a good bet the rate will increase to as much as 25 percent or even 28 percent. No matter where it ends up, it will always be the biggest item reducing the seller’s take-home proceeds.

Soft Cost 1: Escrow

This holdback is one of the least understood by sellers. In fact, many become personally offended at the implications of this customary inconvenience. Our favorite answer to the question of “what is normal?” is “it depends.” Let’s use 2.5 percent to 7.5 percent of purchase price as a range, though prior to our negotiations it might be more like 5 percent to 15 percent. Twelve to 18 months is a typical timeframe. In 99 percent of cases, the seller recovers this, with interest. Buyers need this cushion to true-up the working capital and make sure they’ve bought the asset that was represented. Still, there is a small risk some or all of this amount could be forfeited.

Soft Cost 2: Indemnification, Representations, Warranties

Seller clients often ask us why the buyer wants more than just their word that the accounts, relationships, and the entire business being transferred are above board. Anyone paying $24 million for someone’s business would want reassurance that potential skeletons in the closet were vetted. Buyers put themselves at the highest risk when they buy the stock of the selling corporation. Since most agencies are S-corporations, most deals are transacted as asset purchases which mitigates these risks for buyers.

Wrongful termination claims, sexual harassment claims, ERISA non-compliance, tax liabilities, and slip and fall claims are just some examples of time bombs that can come back to bite a buyer. What if an error is discovered by accountants or tax authorities post deal? Consider knowledge in the legal context: what if it is alleged the seller knew at the time of sale that two or three of the top accounts would be non-renewing? Whether groundless or not, costs would be incurred in defending these claims. If action were to be taken just after a transaction, the buyer and seller would likely both be named.

What is normal as far as indemnification? For more than one of the public buyers, it is 100 percent of purchase price paid, jointly and severally shared among all shareholders. An honest seller negotiating in good faith should be able to sleep at night with these terms. However, soft costs can keep even the most ethical seller awake at night until everything is collected and all related agreements have expired.

So, what is left for shareholder(s) after this sample transaction?

In this example below, 20 percent of the total purchase price is lost to adjustments. Obviously the vast majority is lost to taxes, but even so these other items in this example clip several percentage points and several hundred thousand dollars from the deal proceeds.

Bear in mind when you hear “so and so sold for 8 times EBITDA” that perhaps 6 times or 7 times of that was guaranteed, and the rest had to be earned after the closing. Further, realize that every seller incurs some combination and magnitude of the above costs and holdbacks which make up the accumulated frictional costs of selling a privately-held business. Being informed about all of these components will help you set a more accurate and realistic goal when you try to decide what your net number is. Terms are at least as important as price. Good advisors can easily pay for themselves yet again by negotiating the most favorable terms once price has been settled.

Topics Profit Loss

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

From This Issue

Insurance Journal Magazine February 23, 2009
February 23, 2009
Insurance Journal Magazine

Agency Salary Survey; Boats and Marinas; Agribusiness/Farm and Ranch