Business Risk Exclusion Means No Coverage for Toppled Conn. House

By | February 7, 2010

The Hanover won’t have to pay $26,000 in claims on behalf of a Connecticut contractor who accidentally knocked over the house he was working on, a Connecticut Superior Court has ruled.

The decision stems from a lawsuit by homeowner James Barber, who hired a contractor, Craig Berthiaume, to repair his house. During the repairs, Berthiaume raised the house to install new piers and, in doing so, caused Barber’s house to topple, resulting in $26,000 in damage.

Barber and his insurer, Lloyd’s of London, sued Berthiaume and his insurer, The Hanover Insurance Co., after they tried to recover the cost of the damages. Both declined to pay.

Initially, the court said the toppling of the house was an occurrence under Berthiaume’s general liability policy, was therefore covered, and ruled that The Hanover was obligated to pay. But The Hanover re-argued the case, saying that the toppling of the house was subject to the business risk exclusion of the general liability policy.

The trial judge, agreed, ruling “it is clear that the house in this case was being raised as part of the contract Berthiaume was obligated to perform… therefore the damages to the house (fall within) the business risk exclusion of the policy.”

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

From This Issue

Insurance Journal Magazine February 8, 2010
February 8, 2010
Insurance Journal Magazine

Main Street America-insuring America’s small businesses and their owners.; Errors & Omissions; Nonprofits/Social Services/ Public Entities