States Take Action Against Health Care Reform

April 5, 2010

Many U.S. states are worried that the health care overhaul plan approved by the U.S. House of Representatives will usurp their sovereignty and impose more spending on their already stretched budgets.

Republican attorneys general in at least 12 states announced on March 22 that lawsuits will be filed to stop the federal government from overstepping its constitutional powers.

The federal plan provides funding to help states through the overhaul of the health care industry, which would include requiring Americans to have health insurance and push more people into the Medicaid system.

In addition to lawsuits, many states are trying to pass their own laws and constitutional amendments to keep health insurance optional. Below are some of the steps they are taking:

  • Attorneys general in Alabama, Florida, Michigan, Nebraska, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah and Washington plan to band together in a collective lawsuit.
  • Virginia Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli also announced plans to file a lawsuit in federal court.
  • At least 36 state legislatures are weighing legislation to limit, alter or oppose the federal health care reform, and 27 of those are considering amending their state constitutions by ballot. Arizonans will vote on an amendment in November.
  • Tea Party groups and others in Ohio and Michigan hope to collect enough signatures to place constitutional amendments to fend off federal health care changes on their state’s November ballot.
  • Virginia was the first state to react legislatively, by enacting a statute entitled “health insurance coverage not required.”
  • Idaho Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter signed a bill allowing the state’s attorney general to file a lawsuit opposing federal health care legislation requiring individuals to buy insurance.
  • Utah’s governor has signed into law a bill requiring a state analysis of federal health care reform prior to implementation.
  • Texas Governor Rick Perry says the plan will cost the state $24.3 billion over 10 years.
  • Florida, Georgia and Missouri have begun embarking on constitutional resolutions.
  • The New Hampshire legislature has passed a bill prohibiting any expansion of Medicaid unless it is paid for by the federal government. The current version of the U.S. plan requires the federal government to cover 100 percent of all new Medicaid enrollees through 2016.

States not considering legislative responses include Illinois, North Carolina, New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont, Maine and Massachusetts. Also, there are no measures in Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Texas as there are no regular legislative sessions in these states in 2010.

Topics USA Texas

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

From This Issue

Insurance Journal Magazine April 5, 2010
April 5, 2010
Insurance Journal Magazine

Directors & Officers Liability; Entertainment/Sports/Special Events; Group Products for P&C Agents/Benefits Brokerage Directory