Policyholders facing liability because of asbestos claims will benefit from a March 11 Texas state court ruling, according to the law firm Anderson Kill & Olick.
Judge J. Manuel Bañales of the 105th Judicial District Court of Nueces County, Texas, ruled that “asbestosis” exclusion bars coverage only for asbestosis claims and does not bar coverage for claims involving mesothelioma, lung cancer, pleural plaques or any other asbestos-related disease.
The ruling came in a case brought by ASARCO LLC on the scope of an asbestosis exclusion sold by Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company. ASARCO LLC, et al. v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., et al., No. 01-2680-D (105th Jud. Dist. Ct. Nueces County Tex. Mar. 11, 2009).
On motion for partial summary judgment, ASARCO sought a ruling that the exclusion applied only to claims arising from the specific disease known as asbestosis. In opposition, Fireman’s Fund argued that the exclusion barred coverage for all asbestos-related diseases.
ASARCO, a copper company based in Tucson, Arizona, declared bankruptcy in 2005. At issue in the coverage action is a determination of insurance coverage for past, present and future asbestos liabilities.
Judge J. Manuel Bañales of the 105th Judicial District Court of Nueces County, Texas, issued the Order granting partial summary judgment to ASARCO. Jorge C. Rangel of The Rangel Law Firm in Corpus Christi, Texas, is ASARCO’s local counsel in the case.
Source: Anderson Kill & Olick, P.C.
Topics Texas
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Surplus Lines Commercial Growth; Fla. Litigation Costs Reach New High in 2023 
Woman Used Photos from Another Person in State Farm Claim, NCDOI Says 
The Battle Over J&J’s Bankruptcy Plan to End Talc Lawsuits 
Allstate Seeking 34% Rate Hike on California Homeowners Insurance 
