A bill that would have created special insurance coverage for low-income Colorado drivers was defeated on the House floor. H.B. 1089 would have established a reduced-limits auto policy for low-income consumers, similar to a bill that was recently passed in California.
Although the bill did not include a mandatory offer, insurers were concerned that it would be amended to make it a mandatory offer, according to Michael Harrold, Northwest regional manager for the National Association of Independent Insurers. NAII opposed the measure.
“The Colorado House made a wise decision when it voted down this bill,” Harrold said. A low-cost auto bill is especially unnecessary in Colorado, where state law already exists to offer reduced coverage to low-income drivers, he said.
The current law allows insurance companies to equitably price the low-income policies, while H.B. 1089 would have required insurers to give preferred rates to all low-income drivers. “Mandatory systems are both actuarially unsound and unfair because they create a system where good drivers subsidize bad ones.”
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Consumers’ Refusal to Keep Paying Higher Prices May Halt Inflation Spike 
With American Mobile Out, Florida’s Mobile Home Insurance Market Seems to Have ‘Fallen Apart’ 
U.S. Auto Insurers’ Strong Performance to Continue Through 2025: Fitch 
Winning Lawsuit Against Titan Sub Owner Could Be Difficult, Experts Say 
