Meta Platforms Inc. is wrong to say its $725 million settlement of a lawsuit claiming Facebook illegally shared user data with a controversial research firm protects it from similar claims brought by New Mexico, attorneys for the US state said.
Meta resolved the consumer case over Cambridge Analytica last year, in what lawyers representing Facebook users said was the largest recovery ever in a data-privacy class action. But New Mexico said it was surprised Tuesday when Meta took the position that the agreement arrived at in federal court in San Francisco “will extinguish” a similar lawsuit the southwestern state has filed.
“It is imperative that the court be aware of Facebook’s interpretation of the settlement agreement,” New Mexico said in the filing, “so that it can take all appropriate measures to ensure that the court does not inadvertently release claims raised against Facebook in other cases and jurisdictions.”
Meta said in an emailed statement that lawyers representing New Mexico have “misstated our position, which we will explain to the court.” A hearing is scheduled for Thursday in San Francisco.
The settlement aims to bring to a conclusion a 2018 suit brought by Facebook users after it was revealed that the UK research firm connected to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign for president gained access to the data of as many as 87 million of the social media network’s users. The agreement requires the approval of a federal judge overseeing the suit.
Meta said in December that the settlement was in the best interests of its community and shareholders. Lawyers for the users said Facebook has stopped allowing third parties to access data about users through their friends, and strengthened its ability to restrict and monitor how third parties acquire and use Facebook users’ information.
New Mexico said that through the state’s attorney general it has filed a lawsuit against Meta “arising out of substantially the same facts and circumstances” as those in the San Francisco case, according to the court filing. The settlement agreement “contains no direct reference to the claims brought by the State of New Mexico.”
The case is In Re Facebook Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation, 18-MD-02843, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).
Topics Claims
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Hurricane Beryl: Insurers See Minimal Impact, Brace for Active Season 
Damage From Hurricane Beryl May Cost Insurers $2.7B in US, $510M in Caribbean: KCC 
Hurricane Beryl Triggers Record Payout for Caribbean Insurer 
Insurers Hike Rates as Extreme Storms Like Beryl Proliferate 
