Delaware Judge Says State Farm Off the Hook in Paintball Injury Suit

By | June 10, 2016

Be careful with that thing. It could put someone’s eye out.

That’s the upshot from a Sussex County, Delaware, judge’s ruling that State Farm doesn’t have to indemnify a policyholder in a paintball injury lawsuit.

The June 7 ruling involves an incident in which a boy fired a paintball gun at a group of kids, hitting one of them in the eye and causing a severe injury.

The victim’s family sued the shooter’s family, which sought coverage under their homeowner’s policy.

The judge agreed with State Farm that it is not liable because the policy includes a provision excluding coverage for bodily injury or property damage that is either expected or intended by the insured. He said the shooter intentionally fired the paintball at the other kids knowing that someone could get hurt.

Topics Lawsuits Legislation Delaware

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • June 16, 2016 at 2:40 pm
    Mr. Mister says:
    Chad, the shooter, earlier that day was driven to a Walmart by a friend to buy the gun. He shot from an open car window into a group of kids. I believe Walmart's policy is to ... read more
  • June 16, 2016 at 1:24 pm
    Shari says:
    Typical IJ reporting, if we knew how old the child was, it would make a difference. Young children's actions have normally been covered, even if intentional, because they don... read more
  • June 13, 2016 at 11:49 am
    mr opinion says:
    Unless you are talking about an involuntary spasm, all actions are expected or intended when you make the action. That is not what is excluded. The exclusion applies when th... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (9)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features