A judge has ruled that Traverse City isn’t responsible for declines in property values that could be linked to officials’ decision to remove a northern Michigan dam.
The Traverse City Record-Eagle reports Circuit Court Judge Philip Rodgers effectively dismissed parts of a lawsuit filed by several Boardman River property owners after an October 2012 breach of the Brown Bridge Dam.
The property owners argued Traverse City should be liable for damaging floods and erosion after the dam’s removal. Rodgers disagreed.
Attorney Kristyn Houle, who represents several property owners in the lawsuit, says she “respectfully and strongly disagreed” with Rodgers’ decision. She says even without the breach, property owners still suffered from the decision to remove the dam.
The city-owned dam was built for hydropower generation in 1921.
Topics Legislation Flood Property Michigan
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Allstate, Nationwide Post Dramatic Q12024 Homeowners Loss Ratio Drops: S&P 
Three Charged With Helping Agents Cheat on Florida Insurance License Exams 
Coverage Needed: Hundreds of Thousands in SE Now in Flood Zones With New Maps 
Changes at American Coastal Insurance After Florida OIR Action on ‘No-Fly List’ 
