Industry Groups Call for TRIA Renewal

April 9, 2004

Five insurance associations have called for congressional action to renew the federal government’s terrorism reinsurance program, according to the Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of America.

In letters to House Financial Services Chairman Michael Oxley (R-Ohio) and Senate Banking Committee Chairman Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), the industry groups urged for extension of the current Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) or passage of a modified program.

TRIA is set to expire December 31, 2005. IIABA said it is part of an industry-wide consensus that Congress must act before that deadline in order to provide policyholders and insurers the certainty and security they need as they contemplate long-reaching business transactions. IIABA and the other associations have the support of state insurance regulators, who also are urging Congress to take action.

Since its inception, TRIA has made terrorism insurance available to all types of businesses, including those in areas considered at high risk for terrorist attacks. The program, however, does not extend to personal insurance coverages like auto and homeowners insurance.

Most insureds have opted not to add a terrorism endorsement to their policies, surveys have shown.

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • April 13, 2004 at 1:53 am
    Lance Ewing says:
    TRIA was meant as a stop gap. It should not be perpetual. I believe TRIA should be extended but with a drop dead date so that the carriers, risk management and government ca... read more
  • April 13, 2004 at 1:22 am
    Bob Fike, CPCU, ASLI, ARe, AIT says:
    In as much as most state insurance departments will require the carriers to take on this burden, I for one fully support the concept of the federal government continuing the p... read more
  • April 12, 2004 at 1:19 am
    Jeff DiCenzo says:
    your article does not say who the five groups ARE. Nor does it say whether or noa the IIAA is in support of that. Your article was little more than a headline. Thank you for y... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (4)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features