The Hartford Shedding Bank Used for TARP Bailout

May 23, 2011

The Hartford is divesting Federal Trust Bank, the Florida thrift it acquired in 2009 in order to receive federal bailout money as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).

Davenport, Florida-based CenterState Banks will acquire Federal Trust in a deal that is expected to close in the fourth quarter.

The Hartford will take a $70-million charge this quarter in connection with the divestiture, including losses on certain Federal Trust Bank assets and liabilities which will not be sold to CenterState.

The insurer said the move is part of its overall strategy of shedding non-core operations.

CenterState will assume all of the deposits — approximately $230 million — and purchase selected performing loans — totaling approximately $170 million — and other assets of Federal Trust Bank. CenterState will not pay a premium to assume the deposits and will receive a 27% discount on selected performing loans. CenterState also has the option to put back any purchased loan for up to one year after closing that becomes 30 days past due or becomes adversely classified by applicable regulatory standards.

The Hartford paid $10 million for the bank in 2009 — and soon after received an infusion of nearly $3.4 billion from the federal government, which has since been repaid.

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • June 18, 2011 at 4:06 am
    aps says:
    Consider this: Just a year back, HIG was "prudently" considering repaying back the TARP money, even after making a profit: http://www.hartfordbusiness.com/news11949.html But, ... read more
  • May 24, 2011 at 9:05 pm
    lisa says:
    Everyone needs to get over it! Hartford did it legally, if you feel it was done w/out morals, that is not the problem of the insurer. They were enabled by the government. AIG ... read more
  • May 24, 2011 at 9:34 am
    Bill Rempel says:
    HIG did it all in a legal manner, yes, of course. Here we get into the spirit of the law Vs. the letter of the law. I strongly think that, if it were contemplated that insurer... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (11)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features