Judge Permits Suit Alleging Geico Overcharged Drivers During Pandemic

By | March 7, 2021

The auto insurer Geico Corp., a unit of Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc., must face a proposed class action claiming it overcharged policyholders as the coronavirus pandemic led to less driving and fewer accidents, a judge has ruled.

In a decision on Thursday, U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman in Chicago said Illinois drivers may try to prove Geico violated a state consumer fraud law by unfairly and deceptively marketing its “Geico Giveback” discount program. She dismissed breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims.

Neither Geico nor its lawyers immediately responded to requests for comment on Friday. Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to similar requests.

Geico Sued for Alleged ‘Woefully Inadequate’ Coronavirus Auto Insurance Discount “We’ve made a guess on it. And we’ll see how it works out,” Warren Buffett said last May of Geico’s 15% coronavirus discount. Geico Drives Up Berkshire 2020 Underwriting Profit Geico’s 2020 underwriting profit more than doubled above the level recorded in 2019. Berkshire Insurance Units Hold Their Own While Pandemic Slams Other Buffett Firms Berkshire’s insurance units fared better than other units during the pandemic, according to the conglomerate’s second quarter filing.

Geico had last April offered policyholders $2.5 billion of credits, including 15% on renewals from April to October, averaging about $150 per policy.

But policyholders led by Briana Siegal said this induced them to renew and pay excessive premiums rather than shop around, as stay-at-home orders and closures of businesses and schools resulted in less time on the road.

Siegal also said Geico’s credits compared unfavorably with refunds offered by other insurers.

She cited a report by the Consumer Federation of America and Center for Economic Justice awarding Geico’s program a “D-minus,” below the “A” and “B” grades given to State Farm and Allstate Corp, which offered refunds.

Without ruling on the merits, Coleman said the plaintiffs adequately alleged that Geico misled them into thinking it was passing on all its savings from reduced driving, and failed to disclose that its premiums were “not based on an accurate assessment of risk during COVID-19.”

Geico’s “loss ratio,” or percentage of premiums paid to cover claims, fell to 74.1% in 2020 from 81.3% a year earlier, and was the lowest since 2007.

Berkshire, based in Omaha, Nebraska, has owned all of Geico since 1996. Geico is based in Chevy Chase, Maryland.

The case is Siegal v. Geico Casualty Co. et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, No. 20-04306.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York Editing by Matthew Lewis)

Topics Lawsuits Legislation Personal Auto COVID-19

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • March 8, 2021 at 2:30 pm
    Rosenblatt says:
    Don't forget they also clearly understand a contract covering a 12-month policy term (or 6-month term) is something that can be renegotiated mid-term. End sarcasm.
  • March 8, 2021 at 1:15 pm
    Barry Rabkin says:
    I'm glad that the judge and the folks bringing this lawsuit know so much about frequency and severity of auto insurance claims.
  • March 8, 2021 at 1:11 pm
    Placement GURU says:
    Geico: 15 months of COVID can cost you 15% or more on car insurance.

Add a CommentSee All Comments (3)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features